In Dalby’s case, several important lessons emerged regarding trust income distribution:
Tribunal Limitations: When contesting an objection decision, both taxpayers and the Tribunal are restricted to the grounds of the objection. This means that arguments must align with the initial objections raised, unless the Tribunal agrees to extend them.
Tax Warning: The Tribunal's authority is also confined to these grounds of objection, as confirmed in previous cases. It cannot simply interpret the law based on its own discretion but must adhere to specified statutes.
Post Year-End Adjustments: Dalby’s case highlights the significance of considering post year-end adjustments to net income. Failure to address such adjustments timely, as seen in Dalby’s case, can lead to adverse tax implications.
Importance of Trust Resolutions: Trustees should always prepare trust resolutions, even if they believe there is no taxable income or anticipate a tax loss. This ensures proper distribution of income in case of unexpected adjustments.
Default Beneficiary Clause: While not explicitly mentioned in Dalby’s case, the absence of a default beneficiary clause can complicate trust matters. Including such a clause in the trust deed is advisable to ensure clarity in income distribution.
In conclusion, trustees, beneficiaries, and tax advisors can benefit from the lessons of Dalby’s case by prioritizing timely trust resolutions, considering default beneficiary clauses, and understanding tax implications related to trust income distribution.
Got questions? Reach out to Tax Ideas Accountants & Advisers at +61 2 83181545 or book an appointment on our live calendar.